You do not live in a country. Your country no longer exists. What does exist, and all that there is may come to a suprise to some, and not to others.

 

What does this mean for you, the Citizen? Do you even know wht that means? We shall cover the Citizen-Ship another time, today it's about the Corporations, and Nations that once were.

 

Maps and Women

If yoou are not farmilliar wirth the 1970's classic movie 'Network '76' with Peter Finch, Faye Dunnaway, William Holden, Robert Duvall then you have missed out on some of the most revalating film making of that era, and for that matter 'ever'. Go down to your local Video Library and get it out. Whilst you are there grab 'They Live' as well, just for kicks. Same era, very revalating in a sci-fi way.

 

 

Network is an indepth deconstruction of a typical TV station and their hell bent quest to rule the airwaves. Even by expoloiting one of their own, Howard Beal, portrayed by the well known Peter Fich. The depths the TV Corporations will go, and how deep they allready are is revealed in this classic film of a not so distant past.

 

In the 1970s, terrorist violence is the stuff of networks' nightly news programming and the corporate structure of the UBS Television Network is changing. Meanwhile, Howard Beale, the aging UBS news anchor, has lost his once strong ratings share and so the network fires him. Beale reacts in an unexpected way. We then see how this affects the fortunes of Beale, his coworkers (Max Schumacher and Diana Christensen), and the network.

 

Some memorabloe quotes and familliar clips have found themselves into many  modern doco or expose. This excerpt below is one of many I like very much, and one I think that sums up what is today, the reality of the Nations we once loved, which are now, mere corporate shaddows of what was once the Great Nations of yesteryear.

 

 You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations. There are no peoples. There are no Russians. There are no Arabs. There are no third worlds. There is no West. There is only one holistic system of systems, one vast and immane, interwoven, interacting, multivariate, multinational dominion of dollars. Petro-dollars, electro-dollars, multi-dollars, reichmarks, rins, rubles, pounds, and shekels. It is the international system of currency which determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the natural order of things today.

 

Dear folks, this is a call to arms, with said arms being your pens, keyboards and phones. Please do what you can. 

Dean Clifford Wanted

Minister's Office
Phone: 204-945-3728

Fax: 204-945-2517
Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Ombudsman: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
TO: ANDREW SWAN
Minister of Justice
Manitoba

Dear Andrew Swan,

I bring to your immediate attention the abuse of power and perversion of procedure my friend Dean Clifford is being subjected to in a prison for which you are responsible.

Written by Dan Hughes
 

At this point I would like to publish the Oath that all Policemen and Policewomen swear in this country – the Oath is known as the “Attestation” in the force and it goes like this!
Its printed here:-bobby-s-uniform


" I . . . . . of . . . . . do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve the 
Queen in the office of constable, with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding 
fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I continue to hold the said office I will, to the best of my skill and knowledge, discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law."
So looking at that Oath I see that it speaks only of “serving the queen in the office of Constable”


So lets look up the definition of a Constable


CONSTABLE - An officer, generally elected by the people, who possesses power as a conservator of the peace at common law, and by virtue of various legislative enactments.
He may therefore apprehend a supposed offender without a warrant, as treason, felony, breach of the peace, and for some misdemeanours less than felony, when committed in his view. He may also arrest a supposed offender upon the information of others but he does so at his peril, unless he can show that a felony has been committed by some person, as well as the reasonableness of the suspicion that the party arrested is guilty. He has power to call others to his assistance or he may appoint a deputy to do ministerial acts.
A constable is also a ministerial officer, bound to obey the warrants and precepts of justices, coroners and sheriffs. Constables are also in some states bound to execute the warrants and process of justices of the peace in civil cases.
In England, they have many officers with more or less power, who bear the name of constables; such as, lord high constable of England, high constable, head constables, petty constables, constables of castles, constables of the tower, constables of the fees, constable of the exchequer, constable of the staple, etc.
In some of the cities of the United States there are officers called high constables, who are the principal police officers where they reside.
Blimey ... thats interesting! Lets take a closer look at this then ...
So we see that a “Constable” is “an officer, generally elected by the people”?
 
I would love to know if there is common law or old law that confirms that every Police Constable has to be elected by the people, if this is true then it means overnight that every Policeman and Police woman in the land is UNELECTED and therefore is NOT a Constable! Ooh somebody please tell me its true!

Police Board warned of sovereign movement
By Chet Greason, Staff reporter
wfs-coin-globe-map-2
There’s a small contingent of individuals in Canada who are rethinking the way they interact with the government and the culture at large. The Freeman on the Land and their unique ideology have been around for a number of years, with pockets in London, Guelph, and Owen Sound, elsewhere in British Columbia and Quebec, and beyond to places like Scotland and New Zealand. However, up until last month, the sovereign movement has been somewhat unheard of in Perth County.

Then, at the most recent St. Marys Police Services Board meeting, Perth County OPP Detachment Commander Steve Porter brought up the movement, saying Perth OPP had had a run-in with someone in North Perth claiming to be a Freeman on the Land. He described the movement as an “interesting group” who don’t acknowledge government associations and believe they have the right to move about without government intervention. The local detachment has since received training on how to deal with these individuals, who drive without driver’s licenses.

The St. Marys Journal Argus sought out the Freemen in an effort to better understand how they function, and eventually came into contact with Rob Menard, a leader in the movement with a number of videos on YouTube explaining how the lifestyle works.

“The problem we see is that so many people agree to be bound by statutes, never read them, and then assume there exists duties under that Act,” he explains through email correspondence. “They then claim we too are bound by those words, though we never agreed. We study and read that same Act, realize the limits of authority granted and obligations generated, and then operate within the law. The people who have never read the Act and assume it is the law then claim we are breaking the law.”

Menard says a large part of the Freeman stance comes from this distinction between law and statutes. “If you imagine the law as that which allows us to contract, and then statutes as the terms of a contract, you will get close to our perspective,” he says. “It is our position that contracts require mutual consent, as does membership in a society.”

Freemen literature found online describes the Canadian government as a corporation, no different than a company like Wal-Mart, with citizens operating as employees; but, goes the thinking, if you don’t want to be employed by Wal-Mart and follow their rules, why should you?

Magna Carta

Throughout the ages mankind’s ingenuity has allowed one group of people to control others. The creation of the ‘legal fiction’ is a superb example – it is the very foundation of how we are controlled today and yet the knowledge of its existence eludes all but a tiny few of us.

Judges know how the ‘legal fiction’ applies to each of us, but barristers, solicitors, Magistrates and politicians mostly do not – it is a closely guarded secret. Our courts impose their will on us using the ‘legal fiction’ and it is through this imposition that governments are able to control every facet of our lives. Without the ‘legal fiction’ governments and an array of authorities have no power over us whatsoever and with this in mind it is perfectly clear that understanding the ‘legal fiction’ is a prerequisite to understanding how the world around us really works as distinct from how we think it does. Knowledge and understanding of the legal fiction is the first step on the road of freedom.

So What Is The Legal Fiction & How Does It Impact On Our Lives?

If you tried to explain the concept of the ‘legal fiction’ to the average individual in the context of how it applies to them, there is a high degree of probability that they would stare back at you as though you were quite mad... explanation rarely attracts a demand to know more, which it should, generally people find comprehension beyond their scope of understanding and they prefer therefore to dismiss it as an absurdity. The creators of the legal fiction knew this and have used our own ignorance to further their aims to control and dominate us, their ultimate weapon being ‘plausible deniability.’ But suddenly we are waking up to what is really going on and as we do the shackles of control are starting to loosen.